Welcome to the current issue of the Journal of Family Rights and Intellectual Property (JFRIP). This issue features the latest research articles, reviews, case studies, and perspectives in the areas of family rights and intellectual property law.
Featured Articles in the Latest Issue
- Volume 3(Issue 1) JANUARY- JUNE 2026
Research Articles
Balancing Child Image Rights and Commercial Intellectual Property in Social Media Influencer Families
Vol.3(1); Pages:1-12. Published on April 2026
Abstract
The rapid expansion of digital commerce and transnational data exchange has generated complex legal questions regarding jurisdiction, privacy protection, and regulatory harmonization. This study examines the evolving jurisprudence surrounding cross-border data governance with particular attention to judicial approaches adopted in major common-law jurisdictions. Through a comparative doctrinal analysis, the research evaluates statutory frameworks, judicial precedents, and regulatory principles governing data localization, consent-based processing, and international data transfers. The study identifies significant variations in judicial reasoning concerning the balance between individual privacy rights and state interests in security and economic regulation. Particular emphasis is placed on the interpretation of proportionality, necessity, and accountability standards in digital governance disputes. Findings indicate that courts increasingly rely upon constitutional principles and human rights doctrines to resolve conflicts arising from emerging technologies. The research further demonstrates that legal fragmentation across jurisdictions may create uncertainty for multinational enterprises and regulators. By synthesizing comparative legal developments, the study proposes a framework for greater consistency in judicial decision-making and international cooperation. The analysis contributes to contemporary legal scholarship by highlighting pathways for integrating technological innovation with robust legal safeguards while preserving fundamental rights and democratic accountability in the digital age.
View Full PDF
Please LOGIN to View Full PDF or Read more.
Inheritance of Intellectual Property Assets in Transnational Families: Emerging Legal Challenges
Vol.3(1); Pages:13-22. Published on May 2026
Abstract
Intellectual property assets increasingly constitute a substantial portion of family wealth, particularly in knowledge-based economies. This article investigates the legal complexities surrounding the inheritance of copyrights, patents, trademarks, and related intangible assets within transnational families. By examining statutory provisions, judicial decisions, and international private law principles, the study explores how succession rules interact with intellectual property ownership across different jurisdictions. The research identifies significant challenges concerning valuation, jurisdictional conflicts, transfer procedures, and the recognition of heirs’ rights. Particular emphasis is placed on families whose members reside in multiple countries, creating uncertainty regarding applicable law and enforcement mechanisms. The findings demonstrate that inconsistent national regulations often result in fragmented ownership structures and prolonged disputes among beneficiaries. The article also evaluates the effectiveness of existing international instruments in resolving succession-related intellectual property conflicts. It concludes that greater harmonization is necessary to ensure legal certainty and efficient transmission of intellectual property assets between generations. Recommendations include standardized conflict-of-law rules, improved registration systems, and enhanced cross-border cooperation among legal authorities. The study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how family succession principles can be adapted to the realities of globally distributed intellectual property portfolios.
View Full PDF
Please LOGIN to View Full PDF or Read more.
Marital Property Division and Patent Ownership Following Divorce: A Comparative Jurisdictional Study
Vol.3(1); Pages:23-34. Published on May 2026
Abstract
The division of intellectual property assets during divorce proceedings presents increasingly complex legal questions, particularly when patents represent substantial economic value. This study examines the treatment of patent ownership and associated revenue streams within marital property distribution systems across selected jurisdictions. Using comparative legal methodology supplemented by analysis of judicial decisions and policy documents, the research investigates how courts determine ownership interests in patents developed before, during, and after marriage. The findings reveal substantial variation in legal treatment, especially regarding non-monetary contributions by spouses who support research and innovation activities. While some jurisdictions emphasize formal inventorship, others adopt broader equitable principles that recognize indirect contributions to patent development. The study further highlights challenges associated with valuing future licensing income, assessing commercialization potential, and balancing economic fairness with innovation incentives. Results indicate that existing frameworks often struggle to accommodate the unique characteristics of intellectual property assets. The article proposes a set of legal principles designed to improve consistency and fairness in divorce-related patent disputes. These recommendations seek to protect family property rights while preserving incentives for technological innovation and entrepreneurial activity. The findings are relevant to policymakers, family law practitioners, and intellectual property specialists confronting increasingly sophisticated marital asset portfolios.
View Full PDF
Please LOGIN to View Full PDF or Read more.
Guardianship Decisions and Copyright Control over Creative Works Produced by Minors
Vol.3(1); Pages:35-45. Published on May 2026
Abstract
Children and adolescents increasingly produce original literary, artistic, musical, and digital works that qualify for copyright protection. This development raises important questions regarding guardianship authority, parental decision-making, and the independent legal interests of minors. The present study explores the extent to which guardians should exercise control over copyrighted works created by children and how legal systems can balance protection with autonomy. Through a review of statutory frameworks, judicial precedents, and international child-rights principles, the article evaluates existing approaches to ownership, licensing, commercialization, and moral rights. The analysis demonstrates that many jurisdictions provide limited guidance regarding conflicts between parental authority and a child creator’s emerging interests. Particular concerns arise when creative works generate commercial value or public recognition. The study argues that traditional guardianship models are insufficient for addressing the economic and reputational implications of contemporary digital creativity. It recommends legal reforms that recognize graduated decision-making authority based on age, maturity, and creative contribution. Enhanced safeguards for earnings management and long-term rights preservation are also proposed. By integrating family law principles with copyright governance, the article offers a framework for protecting young creators while respecting legitimate parental responsibilities and child welfare objectives.
View Full PDF
Please LOGIN to View Full PDF or Read more.
Family-Owned Brands, Generational Transition, and Trademark Protection Strategies
Vol.3(1); Pages:46-57. Published on June 2026
Abstract
Family-owned enterprises frequently rely on trademarks that embody both commercial goodwill and family identity. As leadership transitions occur across generations, disputes may arise concerning ownership, management authority, licensing arrangements, and brand continuity. This study investigates the legal and strategic dimensions of trademark protection during generational succession in family businesses. Using qualitative analysis of documented business transitions, judicial decisions, and trademark management practices, the research examines how intellectual property assets contribute to organizational stability and long term value creation. The findings indicate that inadequate succession planning often results in ownership fragmentation, governance disputes, and diminished brand strength. The study also reveals that emotional attachment to family identity can influence trademark-related decision-making in ways that differ from conventional corporate environments. Effective succession strategies were found to involve early documentation of ownership rights, structured governance arrangements, and clear licensing frameworks among family members. The article further assesses the role of trademark law in preserving brand reputation while facilitating leadership change. Recommendations are offered for integrating intellectual property management into broader family business succession planning. The research contributes to understanding how family rights and trademark protection can operate together to support sustainable intergenerational enterprise development and legal certainty.
View Full PDF
Please LOGIN to View Full PDF or Read more.
Thank you for your interest in the Journal of Family Rights and Intellectual Property (JFRIP). We hope you find the articles in this issue both informative and inspiring.
